Saturday, 25 June 2016

Waking up with a Brexit hangover

I made a promise to respect the democratic decision of my compatriots. It has been hard but it is what democracy is all about and over the next few weeks as we see the impact of the vote we cannot fall prey to arguing and falling out. We must go forward. We must work to fix it. 

The Mirror has an inflammatory headline “EU says pack your bags”. It is important to understand that once we made this vote we could no longer control the outcome. The leaders of EU countries do not want to see the economic issues now facing us to spread across Europe so they will act quickly to contain the issue and move the UK out of the EU. 

This morning the UK has had its credit rating outlook downgraded to "negative" by the ratings agency Moody's. I suspect many people don’t know what that means because we don’t teach investment strategy in school. The rating agency looks at risk factors involved in purchasing shares, so that those that want to invest in companies can choose to balance the risk they take when investing their money, with the reward they hope to make in the future. A negative rating will lead to some investors selling more shares than they buy or selling for less. This will reduce the value of the stock market as a whole. This also has an effect on any ‘index linked’ financial product, such as endowments and pension funds.

In addition the pound has dropped in value, because fewer investors want to invest in our currency. This means you will get less of other currencies when you go abroad. It will probably recover a bit but we won’t see the strong pound again for a while. This has two impacts, money in the pocket becomes a little less valuable and the cost of living goes up because we import so much into the UK. All of these things will increase in price because the pound buys less. This then leads to a quicker rate of inflation. 



The Bank of England might reduce interest rates to help people who may struggle to pay mortgages, however this causes problems for those who are retired and living off savings because interest on savings is also reduced. In the past some government policies have been to do the opposite; raise interest rates to attempt to reduce inflation, but this leads to people losing their homes or businesses becoming bankrupt.

One of the greatest misconceptions I have seen in the press is the idea that banks exist to ‘look after our money’. They don’t. They exist to make money. They offer interest for people to put money into a bank, so they can use that money to loan to other people, to invest in companies (or go on holiday), and they make money by charging interest – loan interest rates are therefore higher than savings interest rates. No altruism – don’t expect it. 



The Daily Mail headline condemning the money traders for making money from a falling pound show a marked lack of understanding of what money markets are for. Investors trade in currency because they want the most stable currency, the traders make their commission on each trade. This is capitalism – this is how it works.

We don’t exist in isolation, we are only an island geographically and what happens in the UK affects global financial markets. So our decision has led to problems for the Japanese. They have a very strong export market and they didn’t need a strong Yen, a weaker pound has led to investors buying Yen. So our isolationist approach to voting has had reverberations all over the world.

I hope that we can find a way to quickly calm down the markets and reduce the impact on individuals. I hope that we can see some sensible fiscal policy making as we go forward. Now we must put our hurt, anger and ego to one side and start working on the policies, structures and innovations that will pull the UK back from recession. The EU must do the same, but without us. This was our choice, not theirs. 


Thanks Dave! 


UK Credit outlook



Tuesday, 21 June 2016

All that nonsense about Sausages

So a few years back and a party some slightly tipsy civil servant made a joke along the lines of “soon Brussels will be telling us bananas are not bendy enough”. Out of that comment came one of the silliest and long standing ‘Euro Myths’ of all time.

OK – so its this simple –

Banana Fact 1:
We have a class system for Bananas. If we want to buy the best banana in Europe we buy a class A banana, this kind of banana will have a certain amount of curve, ripeness, smoothness of skin etc. If you want to call it a class A banana it has to look like a class A banana. Simple. If you have other kinds of bananas that is ok – they just can’t be called class A.

Second Banana fact: 

the UK don’t grow bananas



Third Banana fact: 
Bananas are imported into the EU from various countries, some of whom have a slightly less stringent approach to pesticides/fertilizers than us. Including things that can affect our health. So the EU has made a lot of trade agreements that protect consumers aiming to ensure those trading bananas with EU countries have not used harmful chemicals. Also occasionally we have a mild falling out with other countries and impose import/export sanctions on them (remember South Africa? Russia?). The EU operates some of that legislation for us. I used to make my own joke that there were only Ten Commandments but the EU directive on importing bananas covers 26 pages. However all of this is about protecting us as European consumers. It not about the bend in the banana it’s about not having binapacryl in a banana. (Disclaimer – not science here - I just chose a banned fertilizer than began with B). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binapacryl

And the sausage?
Well that was an episode of Yes Minister but yes the EU does have sausage legislation and it has meant that sausages sold in supermarkets must show how much meat is used in them. This labelling has helped us all make healthier food choices. This also helped the UK sell good quality British sausages abroad and made my live a lot easier when importing British sausages to Finland.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzeDZtx3wUw

Before you vote: check out the facts at http://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35603388



It is all about the Money


I’m writing this short post from Timisoara in Romania. This is a stunning European city – and I am working here. I just got on a plane and came to work. This city has had some European money to help with regeneration, but then so has Liverpool (where I was last week). It has also had a lot of support from EU projects in terms of democratic development. I’ m here to work with a team from over 12 different EU countries for a workshop on how to host a Public Hearing. This is what the EU funds – projects that bring people together to share our knowledge and make the whole of Europe a better and more peaceful place. Peace. This is what I voted for when I voted to remain. (By post because I did not know which country I’d be in).

This post is about money and risk.


Please note this is a simplified version of the economics so please read the links for more in depth information. First I want to talk about confidence. Whilst studying the Great Depression of 1926 I remember my lecturer telling us that ‘Its all a confidence trick’ that basically shares and stocks increase in value because the market has confidence in the future value of those shares. If those holding shares lose confidence they sell their shares and because there are more shares for sale, and people are less confident about them they are worth less money. So share prices drop and people lose money.

When we are uncertain about the impact of something it affects share prices. We are already seeing some wobbles in share prices as investors hedge their bets and sell some of the shares in companies that they think might be affected by leaving the EU.

http://www.inet.ox.ac.uk/news/Brexit#.V1hk-Y4EPMQ.facebook

This brings me to my second point. We don’t really know how ‘Brexit’ is going to affect individuals financially. Falling share prices affect us all and some companies may find they lose investment so cannot expand, or may have to contract. We could see jobs being lost. Small business in particular will be affected by the rising legal costs of trading with the EU. There may be some longer term benefits but actually no one can predict these thing on either side. In a time of existing austerity it seems rash to rock the boat. I’m voting to remain because we already have so much uncertainty it just not worth adding any more.
Read this very useful summary of the financial arguments on both sides before you vote

http://blog.moneysavingexpert.com/2016/06/05/how-to-vote-in-the-eu-referendum



Wednesday, 25 May 2016

On being European



In or out?

Just recently a number of people have asked me – what is your position on Europe – in or out?

I am afraid I can’t respond with a noisy Katie Hopkins style sound bite and I am avoiding too much 'economist speak'. This blog is an invitation to my friends  to take a few moments to see the reasoning behind the vote I will make on  23 June.

My first point is that I am European. 
I have travelled extensively in Europe using a UK drivers’ license which is valid throughout the EU, enjoying the food and drinking the wine (but not at the same time because of EU rules on drink driving) and also having access to healthcare. English is my first language but I have been blessed to live in Italy and Finland. Until last week I was one of the 1.4 million British people living abroad in the EU. Being European means I can easily escape English weather and enjoy what Greece, Spain and Portugal have to offer. I have also been very lucky to study in Europe and lead exchange visits, partner projects and a range of other education opportunities. In 2013 more than 14,500 UK students practised language skills, broadened their horizons and improved their job prospects through the European Union’s Erasmus student exchange scheme. I am proud to be a part of Europe and the opportunities it offers us.


My second point is that we currently face really troubling times. As a historian I can absolutely tell you that working together really is the best way to find strategies to overcome our challenges. Nationalism really did not help anyone in 1939 and it’s not going to help us now.  We created so much of what the European Union and the European Commission is about – it is ours and we cannot abandon it now because it is facing challenges. I find myself agreeing with William Hague who said last year that We still need the EU to provide the safe harbour for the docking of fragile democracies, and it would be strange to champion that idea but abandon it ourselves.”  There are many things I think could be improved about the EU and we still need more informed and intelligent debate on what is best for the economy, migration and security. What I know from working for on EU projects is that by working together we have access to wider research, broader options and the economies of scale that we would not have on our own.

And so to my third point; a shared Europe means shared burdens and shared responsibility. Being part of the EU means we make laws together, saving each individual country vast amounts of time and money. Common rules for the single market make it unnecessary to have 28 sets of national regulations, thus cutting red tape and reducing the amount of information required to trade effectively.  This is very important for small to medium enterprise here in the UK. 

We can take a joined up approach to saving lives and promoting peace. It would be immoral and impractical to distance ourselves from Europe’s current challenges. This is, however, more than a challenge to the ‘I'm all right Jack mentality‘. We would not actually be all right. I'm not scaremongering – just pointing out that the single market is really, really important to us. Being part of it means we can shape it, benefit from it and ensure we have the edge in business. Around 3.5 million British jobs are directly linked to British membership of the European Union’s single market – 1 in 10 British jobs, including my own. The EU buys over 50 per cent of UK exports and the single market makes that easier. Over 300,000 British companies and 74 per cent of British exporters operate in other EU markets. Firms from outside the EU build factories in Britain because the single market ensures wider trade with Europe. The EU negotiates trade agreements with the rest of the world on behalf of us.



Beer in Brussels
Take a little time to reflect on all this :)

These trade deals are not unfavourable to us. The EU is the world’s largest market, but the UK outside the EU would not be a high priority for other counties to negotiate a trade deal. More significantly we would have to shoulder all the additional costs of renegotiating trade deals alone. “Ah - but Norway” I hear you say. Well, my Norwegian friends might want to fill us in on the impact of not being part of the EU but I suspect they don’t want fishing quotas, despite the implications of over fishing, and of course oil trade negotiations are worldwide. They already do equality and welfare better than most EU member states. I’d like to point out though, I once paid the equivalent of £12 for a pint of beer in Stavanger, Norway.

A little more time to reflect perhaps?
Aside from enabling us to purchase cheap wine and beer from other places in the EU, the EU has also been responsible for negotiating lower mobile phone roaming charges, lower credit card fees, cheaper flights and proper compensation when flights are delayed or cancelled. It a really great club to belong to and I will be reluctant to leave. If you want to chat sensibly about the EU I do have an MBA in International Development, a background as a historian and 13 years of working on EU projects. Please join me for a glass of Bordeaux or Leffe brun. If, however, you want to indulge in a nationalistic rant please just get on with that elsewhere.

And the answer – IN please! Cheers, Kipis, Sante 



Me - graduating in Paris with champagne and parents